Wednesday 7 October 2009

Closure of e-filing system for years of assessment 2008 & 2009

Please be informed that the Inland Revenue Board (IRB) has informed the Institute on 2 October that

(i)         The e-filing of forms e-E, e-B, e-BE, e-M, e-P, e-C, and e-R for the year of assessment (YA) 2008 will be closed from 8 October 2009 permanently.

(ii)        The e-filing of forms e-C, e-R and e-CP 204 for the YA 2009 will be temporarily closed from 9 October 2009 till 22 October 2009 (14 days) for maintenance.

CTIM has requested the IRB to defer the “closure” (in (ii) above) to November to allow companies with financial year ended 31March 2009 to do their filing (Form e-C).  However, the IRB has informed the Institute that, due to time constraint (the Budget date, 23 October, being later than usual) and the fact that the system is operating at full capacity, the system has to be shut down for maintenance to prepare for the proposals for the 2010 Budget.  Otherwise, it will too late for the IRB to work on the 2010 Budget amendments.

Members may view the IRB letter at the Institute’s website at http://ctim.org.my/technical_techdev_direct.asp.

Friday 2 October 2009

List Of Taxable And Non-Taxable Services For The Purposes Of Service Tax

The Royal Customs Malaysia (RCM) has, on 14 September 2009, issued a “List of Taxable and Non-taxable Services for the Purposes of Service Tax”.  The list indicates the types of taxable and non-taxable services for the various industries/service providers such as  accountants, private hospitals, hotels, parking operators, lawyers, consultants, restaurants, telecommunications companies, etc.

The RCM has indicated that the list is to be used only as a guide and should not be taken as conclusive when making decisions.  You may obtain further clarification/details from the RCM at 03-8882 2100 (telephone), 03-8889 5869 (fax) or e-mail cd@customs.gov.my

  

Customs (Amendment)(No.4) Regulations 2009 [P.U.(A) 313-2009]

Regulation 11A and Part I of Second Schedule of Customs Regulations 1977 have been amended and are effective from 27 August 2009.  Form Customs No. 1A (Value Declaration Form) is to be completed and submitted together with form Customs No. 1 if the invoice value of imported goods for any one consignment is RM 20,000 or more, the imported goods are for commercial purposes and the import duty is levied on the goods.

Wednesday 30 September 2009

Joint Tax Working Group on Financial Reporting Standards (JTWG-FRS)

Following our e-CTIM No.43/2009 dated 16 September 2009, please be informed that the JTWG-FRS has further reviewed the following Financial Reporting Standards (FRS) and would like to circulate the draft write-ups on major tax implications related to the implementation of the FRS for your comments:

FRS 102
FRS 140

Please be informed that the above write-ups as attached can also be downloaded from the Institute’s website at http://ctim.org.my/technical_pracstatement.asp .

Members are invited to review the above write-ups and submit their comments to the JTWG-FRS.  Comments should be submitted in writing to the CTIM’s Secretariat or email to kslim@ctim.org.my or technical@ctim.org.my by 21 October 2009 for the deliberation of the JTWG-FRS.  You may also fax your comments to the Institute at 03-2162 8990.

Comments may refer to any specific principles, paragraphs or group of paragraphs and suggestions for alternative solutions or wordings with supporting reasons.  These comments will be collated and, where appropriate, incorporated into the write-ups before finalisation.

The Institute looks forward to receiving your comments on the above matter.

Thank you.


ANN VONG
Executive Director

Click HERE for printer-friendly version of the circular

Wednesday 2 September 2009

Joint Tax Working Group on Financial Reporting Standards (JTWG-FRS)

Following our e-CTIM No.20/2009 dated 24 April 2009, please be informed that the JTWG-FRS has reviewed the following Financial Reporting Standards (FRS) and would like to circulate the draft write-ups on major tax implications related to the implementation of the FRS for your comments:

FRS 2
FRS 5

Please be informed that the above write-ups as attached can also be downloaded from the Institute’s website at http://ctim.org.my/technical_pracstatement.asp .

Members are invited to review the above write-ups and submit their comments to the JTWG-FRS.  Comments should be submitted in writing to the CTIM’s Secretariat at technical@ctim.org.my or email to kslim@ctim.org.my by 23 September 2009 for the deliberation of the JTWG-FRS.  You may also fax your comments to the Institute at 03-2162 8990.

Comments may refer to any specific principles, paragraphs or group of paragraphs and suggestions for alternative solutions or wordings with supporting reasons.  These comments will be collated and, where appropriate, incorporated into the write-ups before finalisation.

The Institute looks forward to receiving your comments on the above matter.

Thank you.
ANN VONG (MS)
Executive Director


Click HERE for printer friendly version of this circular

Friday 21 August 2009

Income Tax (Exemption) (No.3) Order 2009 [P.U.(A) 262/2009]

Effective from 30 August 2008 until 31 December 2012, income received by a non-resident person under Section 4A(ii) of the Act in relation to the following  training conducted by him for the purpose of upgrading and developing the technical skills of any employee of a person resident in Malaysia, shall be exempt and Section 109B of the Act shall not apply.

The eligible training are training approved by the Minister and under the programme of
(a)    post graduate course in information technology and communication, electronics or life sciences;
(b)    post basic course in nursing or allied healthcare; or
(c)    aircraft maintenance engineering course.

Income Tax (Deduction for Cost of Training for Employees) Rules 2009 [P.U.(A) 261/2009]

Effective from year of assessment 2009 until year of assessment 2012, the cost of the following training incurred by a person for the purposes of upgrading and developing the technical skills of his employees shall be allowed a deduction in addition to any deduction allowable under Section 33 of the Income Tax Act 1967 (the Act). 

The eligible training are training approved by the Minister and under the programme of
(a)     post graduate course in information technology and communication, electronics or life sciences;
(b)     post basic course in nursing or allied healthcare; or
(c)     aircraft maintenance engineering course.

The Rules shall not apply to person who has made a claim to HRDF.

Change of revenue stamps

The Stamp Office has recently informed that beginning from 31 July 2009, the old revenue stamps cannot be used.  Members of the public may exchange the old revenue stamps with the new ones from 1 August 2009 till 31 December 2009 at Stamp Offices or service centres in the branches of Inland Revenue Board

Stamp duty on construction contract instruments

With effect from 1 January 2009, service agreement instruments including construction contracts are subject to stamp duty at the ad valorem rate of RM5 for every RM1,000 or part thereof.  In view that construction projects generally involve multiple tiers multiple levels of stamp duty at ad valorem rate are levied on the same project.  The Ministry of Finance (MOF) has reviewed the situation and in exercising his powers under Section 80(2) of the Stamp Act 1949 has agreed and issued the following guideline:

i)      For contracts awarded by the Government where the agreement is signed between the Government and the principal contractor, the contract is exempted from stamp duty.  Stamp duty at ad valorem rate will be levied on second level contracts (i.e. contracts between the principal contractor and the sub-contractors).  Stamp duty for contracts at the third and subsequent levels will be fixed at RM50.00, and any stamp duty paid in excess will be remitted.
ii)     For contracts awarded by any party other than the Government; stamp duty at ad valorem rate will be levied on the contract between such party and principal contractor.  Stamp duty for contracts at the second and subsequent levels will be fixed at RM50.00, and any stamp duty paid in excess will be remitted.
iii)      For projects that are cancelled by the parties who had offered the contracts, and stamp duty for all such contract had been paid, only the stamp duty at the ad valorem rate  will be refunded.  Stamp duty at the fixed rate of RM50.00 will not be refunded.

The remission of stamp duty is effective from 15 July 2009.  In view that the remission order cannot be gazetted immediately, approval of remission stamp duty meanwhile will be given under Section 80(1A) of Stamp Act 1949 on a case by case basis. 

Guidelines on refund of bad and doubtful debts under Service Tax Act 1975 and Sales Tax Act 1972

Section 31C of Sales Tax Act 1972 stipulates that a person may claim a refund of the sales tax paid in respect of taxable goods if the sales tax has been paid by him on or after 1 January 2003 and the sales tax payable to him has been provided in his accounts as doubtful debt or has been written off in his accounts as bad debt.  In addition, the Director General of RMC must be satisfied that all reasonable efforts have been made by such person to recover the sales tax.  The refund must be claimed within 6 years from the year in which the sales tax was paid. 

The Act defines “bad debts” as the outstanding amount of the payment in respect of the sale of taxable goods including the sales tax which is due to the person but has not been paid to, and is irrecoverable by the person; and “doubtful debts” as a provision made with respect to the outstanding amount in the person’s accounts consistent with the generally accepted accounting principles.

Regulation 19D of the Sales Tax Regulations 1972 further stipulates that a payment is deemed to be irrecoverable if the whole or any part of it has been written off in the seller’s accounts as bad debt and the purchaser
a)       has been filed for bankruptcy or is an adjudged bankrupt,
b)       has been placed under receivership,
c)       has voluntarily wound up or has been ordered by the court to wound up,
d)       has been filed a claim in court by the seller to recover the payment, or
e)       has not paid for the whole or any part of the payment after 6 months from the date such sales tax was paid.

Section 21B of the Service Tax Act 1975 and Regulation 16A of the Service Tax Regulations 1975 have similar provisions as the above.

The guidelines clarify the following:
i)              Refund is available to person who has ceased to be a taxable person under the following circumstances: 
a)    that the person has ceased to manufacture taxable goods/provide taxable services, or the person has been granted exemption from licensing or the annual sales turnover is below the threshold,
b)    that the person has manufactured taxable goods/provided taxable services without licence and has paid the tax but was unable to claim back from his clients,
ii)             Proof of reasonable efforts taken to recover the debts:
a)            For tax owed below RM500, at least 2 registered reminder letters were sent to the debtors;
b)            For tax owed between RM500 – RM10,000, notice of claims was sent to debtor through a law firm;
c)            For tax owed above RM10,000, statement of claims against the debtor was filed in the court
iii)            Documents required to facilitate the claim of refund:
a)            Letter of application for refund,
b)            Prescribed form for claim of service tax/sales tax refund (Form JKED 2),
c)            Statement of claims,
d)            Copy of sales invoices
e)            Form CJP 1 and any documentary evidence that the applicant has paid the relevant tax, such as copy of ledgers, bank statements, receipts, etc.
f)             Records or document that substantiate reasonable efforts have been taken to recover the debts
g)            Records to show that the uncollectable tax has been written off in the accounts,
h)            Declaration by a registered accountant that the amount has been debited as bad debt for claims of refund amounting to RM10,000 and below.  For claims of refunds above RM10,000, such a declaration should be made by a certified /chartered accountant.
i)              Other relevant documentary evidence that the debts are irrecoverable, such as court order that the debtor is declared bankrupt or is under receivership or liquidation, court paper for applicant who has filed a notice claim in the court, board of directors resolution for voluntary winding  up, etc.
iv)           An application for refund should be made for each debtor.  In view that the number of customers is huge for the telecommunications industry but the amount of each debt is small, the applicant may apply to the Director General of RMC for special treatment in respect of individual accounts. 
v)            Where the application for special treatment is approved, the following actions are considered as reasonable efforts taken to recover these debts:
a)            sending reminder letters
b)            reminding the customer through Interactive Voice Reminder,
c)            suspending the service to customer temporarily (Temporary Out-of-Service),
d)            calling or meeting  the customer to recover the debts,
e)            terminating the service to the customer and send the final bill.

Members who wish to know the detailed requirements may view the document at the Institute’s website or at the website of the RMC at

Guidelines on refund of excise duty on returned damaged goods

Section 28 of the Excise Act 1976 stipulates that no dutiable goods shall be consumed or made use of in, or removed from, a place licensed under Section 20 or from a public excise warehouse or a licensed warehouse or excise control except upon payment of duty thereon or under bond for deposit in another public excise or licensed warehouse or for export to outside Malaysia. 
Where dutiable goods are damaged, destroyed or, by unavoidable accident, lost at any time before removal from excise control, the Director General may, pursuant to Section 14(1) of the EA, remit the whole or any part of the excise duty payable thereon.  
Locally manufactured goods on which excise duty has been fully settled and these goods have left the customs area cannot claim refund on excise duty paid when they are returned to the factory later due to damage or inferior quality.  Pursuant to Section 11(2)(b), the Minister is empowered to consider or approve a refund of excise duty levied on local manufactured goods and impose such conditions as he may deem fit.

The guidelines set out the procedures and conditions for application of such refund.  Applicants for refund should submit two sets of applications; one to the Tax Analysis Division of Treasury, and another to the Internal Tax Division of the RMC.  Members may view the document issued by the RMC containing the detailed requirements at the Institute’s website or at the website of the Royal Malaysian Customs at http://www.customs.gov.my/documents/Bahagian%20CD/garis%20panduan%20mengenai%20hutang%20lapuk%20dan%20hutang%20ragu%20di%20bawah%20akta%20cukai%20perkhidmatan%20dan%20akta%20cuk.pdf

Minutes of the Customs-Private Sector Consultative Panel Meeting No. 1/2009

The Royal Malaysian Customs (RMC) has recently released the minutes of the Customs-Private Sector Consultative Panel Meeting No.1/2009 held on 15 July 2009.  

Some of the issues discussed during the meeting were:
    • criteria for the approval of public bonded warehouse licence (issue no. 6),
    • proposal for on-line payment of service tax (issue no. 12),
    • duty payment with the surety of bank guarantee (issue no. 19),
    • delay in announcement of the ASEAN tariff reduction (issue no. 25),
    • delay in issuance of Customs ruling – service tax (issue no. 26),
    • refund of service tax on bad debts (issue no 28),
    • review of definition of taxable services in the  Second Schedule of the Service Tax Regulations 1975 (issue 29),
    • proposal to pay sales tax from the 10th to the15th of every month (issue no. 30),
    • payment of sales tax by telegraphic transfer (issue no. 31),
    • proposal to increase the threshold from  RM100,000 to RM 200,000 for the imposition of sales tax (issue no. 35),  and
    • abuse of licensed manufacturing warehouse (LMW) status (issue no.37).

Members can view the minutes at the Institute’s website.

Saturday 18 July 2009

IRB’s Notice on Taxation of Benefits-In-Kind

The above Notice has been issued as a result of the dialogue between professional bodies and the IRB on 8 May 2009. The IRB has informed of the following:

a)Benefits of free petrol

Employees can elect the tax treatment of the benefit of free petrol to be as follows:

(i)Be taxed at prescribed values under Appendix 2 of the Public Ruling No. 2/2004,

OR

(ii)Claim an exemption of RM2,400 on petrol used from/to home to/from working place and RM6,000 for official travels.

Where the employer is unable to segregate between petrol used from/to home to/from working place and for official travels, then only an exemption of RM6,000 will be given.

b) Benefits of telephone and payment of telephone bills

A concession is given to employers who had reported in the Form EA for the year of assessment 2008 the value of benefit enjoyed by employees on telephone (hardware) at RM300 and telephone bills paid by employer at RM300 (based on Appendix 2 of the Public Ruling No.2/2004), i.e., they do not have to revise the Form EA.

------------------------------------------


PENGUMUMAN

PENGECUALIAN CUKAI KE ATAS MANFAAT BERUPA BARANGAN

Lanjutan daripada dialog bersama persatuan akauntan yang telah diadakan pada 8 Mei
2009, Lembaga Hasil Dalam Negeri Malaysia telah memohon pengesahan daripada
Kementerian Kewangan berhubung pengecualian cukai ke atas manfaat petrol
percuma, telefon dan bayaran bil telefon yang diterima oleh pekerja berkaitan dengan
penggajiannya. Kementerian Kewangan telah memberi persetujuan seperti berikut:

1. Manfaat petrol percuma
Sebelum tahun taksiran 2008, pekerja yang melaporkan manfaat petrol mengikut
nilai yang ditetapkan untuk petrol seperti di Lampiran 2 dalam Ketetapan Umum
No. 2/2004 hanya dikenakan cukai atas amaun yang rendah dibandingkan
dengan penggunaan persendirian sebenar. Oleh itu pengecualian ke atas
penggunaan petrol persendirian telah pun dinikmati oleh pekerja. Berdasarkan
asas tersebut, Kementerian Kewangan telah bersetuju pekerja diberi pilihan
untuk:

a. menentukan amaun petrol percuma yang dikenakan cukai mengikut nilai
yang ditetapkan untuk petrol seperti di Lampiran 2 dalam Ketetapan Umum
No. 2/2004 tanpa pengecualian diberikan; atau

b. mendapat pengecualian bagi amaun petrol yang digunakan seperti berikut:
• perjalanan dari rumah ke tempat kerja/dari tempat kerja ke rumah terhad
RM2,400;
• perjalanan untuk tujuan tugas rasmi terhad RM6,000
Sekiranya majikan tidak dapat menentukan amaun petrol percuma bagi
perjalanan dari rumah ke tempat kerja/dari tempat kerja ke rumah dan perjalanan
untuk tujuan tugas rasmi, pengecualian hanya diberi sehingga RM6,000.

2. Manfaat telefon dan bayaran bil telefon
Konsesi diberi kepada majikan untuk melaporkan manfaat telefon dan bayaran
bil telefon mengikut nilai yang ditetapkan seperti di butiran 1, perenggan 3,
Lampiran 2 dalam Ketetapan Umum No. 2/2004 iaitu:
Telefon (perkakasan): RM300
Bil telefon: RM300
Oleh itu majikan yang telah mengeluarkan Borang EA bagi tahun taksiran 2008
dan melaporkan amaun dikecualikan cukai mengikut nilai seperti di atas tidak
perlu membuat pindaan ke atas borang tersebut.

Dikeluarkan oleh: Jabatan Dasar Percukaian
Lembaga Hasil Dalam Negeri Malaysia
Tarikh: 10 Julai 2009

Wednesday 15 July 2009

Addendum to Public Ruling on Trade Association (PR No. 6/2005)

The Inland Revenue (IRB) has issued the above Addendum to Public Ruling No. 6/2005 on 1 July 2009. This Addendum is issued in accordance to the amendment to Section 53 of the Income Tax Act 1967, as introduced by the Finance Act 2009 (Act 693), to include professional bodies as trade association. The addendum also provides illustration on tax treatment of adjusted loss and unabsorbed capital allowance from the members’ subscription. The Addendum is effective from year of assessment 2009.

You may view the Addendum from the attachment or downloaded it from the Institute’s websites or from the IRB’s website at the following link: http://www.hasil.gov.my/english/pdf/Add_PR06_2005.pdf

Sunday 19 April 2009

FAQ: Practice Note 2/2008 - Change of Financial Year

Question 1:
Following an approved application under section 143(2) of the Companies Act 1965 (CA 1965), can a company hold its Annual General Meeting (AGM) for the preceding calendar year and the current calendar year on the same date?

Answer:
A company is allowed to convene the AGM for the current calendar year on the same date the AGM for the preceding calendar year is held. However, the rules pertaining to the proper constitution of the AGM must be observed including the giving of proper notices to shareholders for each AGM to be held. Chronologically, the AGM for the preceding calendar year must first be convened before convening the AGM for the current year.

A separate notice must be given for the AGM of calendar year 2007 and another for AGM of calendar year 2008 by specifying the place, date and time of meeting. As far as public listed companies are concerned, they still need to strictly observe the requirements under paragraph 7.17 of the Listing Requirements of the Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad pertaining to notices of meetings, including the requirement to advertise the notice of meetings etc.

Question 2:
Pursuant to the operation of section 143(2) of the CA 1965 (due to a change in the financial year), an AGM held beyond the calendar year will be deemed to be held in the calendar year it was supposed to be held. What is the AGM date to be stated in the annual return?

Answer:The date to be stated in the annual return shall be the date when the AGM was actually held.


Question 3:
In what circumstance will an annual return of a company need not be accompanied with an audited account?

Answer:
An annual return lodged must be accompanied with a copy of the audited accounts. However, if by operations of the provisions under sections 143(2) and 169(2) of the CA 1965, have resulted in a situation where there is no accounts to be laid before the AGM, the annual return shall be accompanied with a copy of the approval of the extension of time. An annual return which is not accompanied with a copy of audited accounts or approval of extension of time will not be accepted.

Question 4:
As Practice Note 2/2008 (PN2/2008) allows an annual return to be submitted without a copy of the audited account, will this pose an inconsistency with PN1/2008 that requires all annual returns to be accompanied with a copy of the audited account?

Answer:
There is no inconsistency between PN1/2008 and PN2/2008.

PN1/2008 reiterates the general rule that the submission of an annual return accompanied with a copy of the audited account following the laying of the audited accounts before an AGM in compliance with section 169 of the CA 1965.

PN2/2008 is an exception to the general rule where the submission of an annual return will be accepted without a copy of the audited account ONLY by virtue of the operations of sections 143(2) and 169(2) of the CA 1965 following a change in the financial year. Instead, the annual return must be substantiated with a copy of the approval for an extension of time.


Question 5:
How does a company determine the period in which the next AGM is to be held following an extension of time under section 143(2) of the CA 1965?

Answer:
Section 143(1) of the CA 1965 states that a company is required to convene an AGM once in a calendar year and not more than 15 months after the holding of the last AGM.

If an extension of time has resulted in an AGM being held beyond the calendar year, the period of 15 months runs from that date. Notwithstanding, the company must observe the requirement to convene an AGM for that current calendar year.

Question 6:
Will a compound be issued when no audited account is tabled at an AGM following an approved extension of time under section 143(2) of the CA 1965?

Answer:
Where no account is laid before the AGM pursuant to the operations of sections 143(2) and 169(2) of the CA 1965, no compound will be issued. This is because the audited account due for tabling for the extended period will be adopted at the AGM held pursuant to the extension granted.

CCS Group's Official Website

We are thrilled to announce that CCS Group has launched a new website at www.ccs-co.com Some of the great new features of this newly designe...